User Tools

Site Tools


tirades:2019-06-20

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tirades:2019-06-20 [2024/01/17 10:09] shyriathtirades:2019-06-20 [2024/01/25 09:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation shyriath
Line 1: Line 1:
-Continuing the [[avishraa:community:poradrin:|Poradrin]] stuff is taking a while, so I thought I'd detour into a completely unrelated subject, because sure, why not!+Continuing the [[geopolitical:poradrin:|Poradrin]] stuff is taking a while, so I thought I'd detour into a completely unrelated subject, because sure, why not!
  
-One of the less stable pieces of lore related to the [[xtauh:|xtauh]] and the [[takma:|takmar]] is that they are both prone to suffering a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalassophobia|fear of the open sea]]. This fact has had some strong consequences for the history of their civilizations, because it means that, although they've built ships and boats for a large part of their history, they haven't done anything nearly as impressive with them as humans have. The xtauh have never left sight of their coasts except by accident, and the takmar, while they have crossed relatively narrow seas and colonized minor landmasses, have made no [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynesia#Origins_and_expansion|Polynesian-style voyages]] across thousands of miles of ocean. Unlike Earth, whose continents have all been connected or nearly so during human history, Sekhaa is an isolated continent; the rest of [[avishraa:|Avishraa]] certainly //could// be reached by sail, but it hasn't been yet.+One of the less stable pieces of lore related to the [[xtauh:|xtauh]] and the [[takma:|takmar]] is that they are both prone to suffering a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalassophobia|fear of the open sea]]. This fact has had some strong consequences for the history of their civilizations, because it means that, although they've built ships and boats for a large part of their history, they haven't done anything nearly as impressive with them as humans have. The xtauh have never left sight of their coasts except by accident, and the takmar, while they have crossed relatively narrow seas and colonized minor landmasses, have made no [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynesia#Origins_and_expansion|Polynesian-style voyages]] across thousands of miles of ocean. Unlike Earth, whose continents have all been connected or nearly so during human history, Sekhaa is an isolated continent; the rest of [[universe:mikurmiya:avishraa|Avishraa]] certainly //could// be reached by sail, but it hasn't been yet.
  
 I developed this concept because I wanted there to be a whole unexplored planet to unleash the takmar on, and needed a reason why there still was one, considering that humans, by the same point in their history, had gotten nearly everywhere that there was enough room to stand on. Regardless, I call this lore unstable because I've never really come up with an in-universe reason for it that I can fully convince myself with. My original thought, and the one that is still the "official" explanation, was that it had been a holdover from early in their evolutionary history; shallow water was safe, particularly among grasses and roots, but wide, open water was where you would be exposed to larger predators. But while the idea that evolutionary history can have an impact on landscape preferences is not a [[http://ethnobioconservation.com/index.php/ebc/article/view/122|completely insane idea]], this particular instance is just slightly thin in that it's been a very long time since their lineage has been in a position to worry about most predators of any kind, much less aquatic ones. Would that kind of instinct hold for that long? Maybe - there wasn't anything selecting against it either. There've probably been weirder evolutionary holdovers. I developed this concept because I wanted there to be a whole unexplored planet to unleash the takmar on, and needed a reason why there still was one, considering that humans, by the same point in their history, had gotten nearly everywhere that there was enough room to stand on. Regardless, I call this lore unstable because I've never really come up with an in-universe reason for it that I can fully convince myself with. My original thought, and the one that is still the "official" explanation, was that it had been a holdover from early in their evolutionary history; shallow water was safe, particularly among grasses and roots, but wide, open water was where you would be exposed to larger predators. But while the idea that evolutionary history can have an impact on landscape preferences is not a [[http://ethnobioconservation.com/index.php/ebc/article/view/122|completely insane idea]], this particular instance is just slightly thin in that it's been a very long time since their lineage has been in a position to worry about most predators of any kind, much less aquatic ones. Would that kind of instinct hold for that long? Maybe - there wasn't anything selecting against it either. There've probably been weirder evolutionary holdovers.
tirades/2019-06-20.1705504193.txt.gz · Last modified: by shyriath