Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- takma:social_status [2021/06/16 13:52] – shyriath
+++ takma:social_status [2023/09/18 15:05] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Status interactions are most obvious and formalized among takma females. For reasons related to the species' evolutionary history, females are typically the holders of territory and possessors and distributors of excess resources, and the leverage to obtain greater amounts of both has one's status as an important factor.
-Female status hierarchies may take a number of forms, but are most often some variation of a nested despotic hierarchy: multiple females may be of the same rank, but are only directly dominated by a single individual, who herself may be subordinate to someone else. In some ways the arrangement resembles a military hierarchy of ranks and organizational units; a female of a high enough rank will generally have a group of lower-ranked females under her direct command. She may give her "unit" instructions, but these are expected to be consistent with, and aid in, the implementation of her superior's own directives. Attempting to issue orders to members of another "unit" without permission, however, is greatly frowned upon; as in many things, a female with high enough status to have subordinates is likely to be territorial enough to be extremely jealous of an attempt to poach them from her. Female-led organizations and social structures, therefore, tend to be pyramidal, with either a single leader - if only a symbolic one - or a relatively small collegiate body of equally-ranked leaders, preferably each with well-defined responsibilities.
+Female status hierarchies may take a number of forms, but are most often some variation of a nested despotic hierarchy: multiple females may be of the same rank, but are only directly dominated by a single individual, who herself may be subordinate to someone else. In some ways the arrangement resembles a military hierarchy of ranks and organizational units; a female of a high enough rank will generally have a group of lower-ranked females under her direct purview. She may give her "unit" instructions, but these are expected to be consistent with, and aid in, the implementation of her superior's own directives. Attempting to issue orders to members of another "unit" without permission, however, is greatly frowned upon; as in many things, a female with high enough status to have subordinates is likely to be territorial enough to be extremely jealous of an attempt to poach them from her. Female-led organizations and social structures, therefore, tend to be pyramidal, with either a single leader - if only a symbolic one - or a relatively small collegiate body of equally-ranked leaders, preferably each with well-defined responsibilities.
-Some situations, usually in particular organizations, may have a formal mechanism for implementing particular changes in status desired or needed by the whole, usually reinforced by ceremonies or rituals. Regarding one's place in society as a whole, however, status is generally an informal thing defined by a particular female's own qualities, attitude, material resources, reputation and accomplishments, or personal relationships, and may change as they change. The rise or fall of a female's status in such a milieu can trigger changes of allegiance, schemes to preserve or to appropriate status and its benefits, the breaking and formation of alliances, or the initiation of feuds.
+Some situations, usually in particular organizations, may have a formal mechanism for implementing particular changes in status desired or needed by the whole, usually reinforced by ceremonies or rituals. Regarding one's place in society as a whole, however, status is often, though not universally, an informal thing defined by a particular female's own qualities, attitude, material resources, reputation and accomplishments, or personal relationships, and may change as they change. The rise or fall of a female's status in such a milieu can trigger changes of allegiance, schemes to preserve or to appropriate status and its benefits, the breaking and formation of alliances, or the initiation of feuds.
 ==== Criteria ====
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 === Physical ===
-Physical traits, though not usually the most potent in determining status, are usually among the most universal, as what attracts and repels other people is rooted at least as much in instinctual preference as it is in culture.
+Aspects of physical state, though rarely the most potent factors in determining status in society at large, are usually among the most universal, as what attracts and repels other people is rooted in instinctual preference as well as in culture; though there are certain individuals that would be rated more highly in one place than another, it is rarely hard to find those that a wide cross-cultural poll would agree looks good.
+Higher status tends to be correlated, all else being equal, with:
+  * Intimidation: The appearance of being able to outmatch competitors or foes. This includes greater height and mass, but frequently also physical fitness, muscle tone, and the presence of scars and other injuries that are visibly well-healed.
+  * Fertility: The impression of being able to bear many young. This is connected with particular physical attributes, such as wide hips, the appearance of being decently fed, and the distribution of fat deposits on the body, but also with the more direct evidence of having actually borne children.
+  * Health: Visible physical wellbeing, such as a lack of obvious deformity, debilitating injury, or chronic illness.
+  * Prime age: Often being between around 3.5 and 8 cycles old, but more generally the period when one is not too young to be taken seriously and not too old to be eclipsed by the young. Age-related status declines from this peak, but can be and often is made up for by the accumulation of knowledge, useful contacts, and property.
+  * Dark status markings: Despite being an indicator of status, status markings can also be a cause of it. A female whose self-perceived status is not sufficiently challenged may find the public perception of it growing to match.
+  * Beauty and sex appeal: The attractiveness of a given female as evaluated by those around her and by their observations of the reactions of others, particularly potential suitors; to some extent a matter of personal preference, but also intricately bound up in the other factors in this list.
+=== Material ===
+  * Land holdings: The size and desirability of a female's territorial range. A territory that is larger or more valuable - because of good hunting, agricultural suitability, the presence of natural resources, proximity to useful artisans or service, visual or environmental appeal, and so on - will have a larger impact on status, but the //way// in which it is held is also a factor; for example, all else being equal, one who merely has tenancy or lease on a plot of land will not derive as much status from it as one who has the freehold (and she, in turn, would not derive as much status as a sovereign who held ultimate authority over the land).
+  * Access to basic necessities: Most fundamentally a female's ability to procure food and water, but also shelter, tools and utensils.
+  * Wealth: Essentially, the ability to obtain, store, and protect excess resources. This includes those stored for use at one's own discretion, but also the ability to manage and protect the resources of others, and to do so with honesty and reliability.
+=== Social ===
 ==== Status markings ====
@@ Line 21: / Line 37: @@
 A female's sense of her own status - or, more precisely, her own self-worth and the security of her social position - has a visible representation in the generally drab-to-olive-colored markings present on the faces and across the spines of adult females. These markings vary in shade with the female's self-perceived status in relation to other females with which she is in contact; the higher the status, the darker the markings. The shade may change, particularly among those in the middle ranks who may have darker markings while around subordinates but lighter ones around superiors; the shade is regulated by hormonal levels.
-Generally speaking, the markings of most females are by their very nature at least a roughly accurate indicator of status, since being able to know one's approximate place in the social hierarchy is a basic social skill. However, mismatches do occur, often with dire social consequences. A female with markings far darker than they ought to be might indicate simply a high opinion of oneself or extreme confidence, but may also mean that their bearer has profoundly misjudged what others think of her, or that she is aware of her status but feels it is far less than what she deserves. Such a female is likely to become a lightning rod for attention; if her personality is considered repellent, she may simply alienate everyone, but she will be in greater danger if she has obviously admirable qualities or begins to attract a following, as she may be seen as someone looking to raise her own status to match her shade, which may not be taken well by those who have been her equals and immediate superiors. There may be attempts to put the upstart in her place by forcing a lower status on her, by ostracism or relegation to lower-status duties; how successful these are may depend on how much of a following she's gained, their loyalty, and whether she has support from upper levels of the hierarchy.
+Generally speaking, the markings of most females are by their very nature at least a roughly accurate indicator of status, since being able to know one's approximate place in the social hierarchy is a basic social skill. However, mismatches do occur, often with dire social consequences. A female with markings far darker than they 'ought' to be might indicate simply a high opinion of oneself or extreme confidence, but may also mean that their bearer has profoundly misjudged what others think of her, or that she is aware of her status but feels it is far less than what she deserves. Such a female is likely to become a lightning rod for attention; if her personality or behavior is considered repellent, she may simply alienate everyone, but she will be in greater danger if she has obviously admirable qualities or begins to attract a following, as she may be seen as someone looking to raise her own status to match her shade, which may not be taken well by those who have been her equals and immediate superiors. There may be attempts to put the upstart in her place by forcing a lower status on her, by ostracism or relegation to lower-status duties; how successful these are may depend on how much of a following she's gained, their loyalty, and whether she has support from upper levels of the hierarchy.
-It is relatively rarer for markings to be far lighter than expected, except as a symptom of old age. It may occur for relatively limited periods during times of intense stress or personal loss, for which reason the mourning rituals of many takma cultures call for females to veil their faces for a certain period. If sustained over longer periods, lighter markings may threaten a female's status, though the threat is more meaningful for those of middle rank than those of higher rank, who usually have the resources and connections to command a minimum amount of respect.
+It is relatively rarer for markings to be far lighter than expected, except as a symptom of old age. It may occur for relatively limited periods during times of intense stress or personal loss, for which reason the mourning rituals of many takma cultures call for females to veil their faces or cosmetically alter their markings for a certain period. If sustained over longer periods, lighter markings may threaten a female's status, though the threat is more meaningful for those of middle rank than those of higher rank, who usually have the resources and connections to command a minimum amount of respect.
 ==== Status interactions and behaviors ====
+- Submission to/expectations of social superiors\\
+- Relations among equal-rankers\\
+- Changing behavior with increasing status\\
+- Different statuses in different contexts\\
+- Effects on relations with males
 ==== Female-assigned male status ====